Correlation Between Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Global Technology and Lazard Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Global with a short position of Lazard Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging

-0.61

Correlation Coefficient

Columbia Global  Lazard Emerging

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Lazard is -0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Global Technology and Lazard Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lazard Emerging Markets and Columbia Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Global Technology are associated (or correlated) with Lazard Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lazard Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Columbia Global i.e., Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Global Technology is expected to generate 0.54 times more return on investment than Lazard Emerging. However, Columbia Global Technology is 1.85 times less risky than Lazard Emerging. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Lazard Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,078  in Columbia Global Technology on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  65.00  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 6.03% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Columbia Global Technology  vs.  Lazard Emerging Markets

Columbia Global Tech

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Columbia Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Lazard Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Lazard Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Lazard Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Global and Lazard Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Global position performs unexpectedly, Lazard Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lazard Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Lazard Emerging's long position.

The idea behind Columbia Global Technology and Lazard Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.