Correlation Between Coda Octopus and LEVEL
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Coda Octopus Group and LEVEL 3 FING, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Coda Octopus and LEVEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Coda Octopus with a short position of LEVEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Coda Octopus and LEVEL.
Diversification Opportunities for Coda Octopus and LEVEL
0.41 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Coda and LEVEL is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Coda Octopus Group and LEVEL 3 FING in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on LEVEL 3 FING and Coda Octopus is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Coda Octopus Group are associated (or correlated) with LEVEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of LEVEL 3 FING has no effect on the direction of Coda Octopus i.e., Coda Octopus and LEVEL go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Coda Octopus and LEVEL
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Coda Octopus Group is expected to generate 0.29 times more return on investment than LEVEL. However, Coda Octopus Group is 3.42 times less risky than LEVEL. It trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. LEVEL 3 FING is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest 786.00 in Coda Octopus Group on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (117.00) from holding Coda Octopus Group or give up 14.89% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 68.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Coda Octopus Group vs. LEVEL 3 FING
Performance |
Timeline |
Coda Octopus Group |
LEVEL 3 FING |
Coda Octopus and LEVEL Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Coda Octopus and LEVEL
The main advantage of trading using opposite Coda Octopus and LEVEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Coda Octopus position performs unexpectedly, LEVEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in LEVEL will offset losses from the drop in LEVEL's long position.Coda Octopus vs. Ducommun Incorporated | Coda Octopus vs. Park Electrochemical | Coda Octopus vs. National Presto Industries | Coda Octopus vs. Astronics |
LEVEL vs. Aduro Clean Technologies | LEVEL vs. Arrow Electronics | LEVEL vs. NetEase | LEVEL vs. Golden Energy Offshore |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.
Other Complementary Tools
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |