Correlation Between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Commonwealth Global with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

0.18
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Commonwealth and Goldman is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Technology and Commonwealth Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Commonwealth Global Fund are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Technology has no effect on the direction of Commonwealth Global i.e., Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Commonwealth Global is expected to generate 5.74 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Commonwealth Global Fund is 1.75 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Technology is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,875  in Goldman Sachs Technology on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,616  from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or generate 86.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Commonwealth Global Fund  vs.  Goldman Sachs Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Commonwealth Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Commonwealth Global Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Commonwealth Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Commonwealth Global and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Commonwealth Global position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Commonwealth Global Fund and Goldman Sachs Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk