Correlation Between China Communications and Power Assets

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Communications and Power Assets at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Communications and Power Assets into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Communications Services and Power Assets Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Communications and Power Assets and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Communications with a short position of Power Assets. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Communications and Power Assets.

Diversification Opportunities for China Communications and Power Assets

0.74

Correlation Coefficient

China Communications  Power Assets

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between China and Power is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Communications Services and Power Assets Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Power Assets Holdings and China Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Communications Services are associated (or correlated) with Power Assets. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Power Assets Holdings has no effect on the direction of China Communications i.e., China Communications and Power Assets go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between China Communications and Power Assets

Assuming the 90 days horizon China Communications Services is expected to generate 1.74 times more return on investment than Power Assets. However, China Communications is 1.74 times more volatile than Power Assets Holdings. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Power Assets Holdings is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8.71  in China Communications Services on October 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  43.29  from holding China Communications Services or generate 497.01% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	99.8%
Values	Daily Returns

China Communications Services  vs.  Power Assets Holdings

China Communications

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Communications Services are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, China Communications is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Power Assets Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Power Assets Holdings are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Power Assets is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with China Communications and Power Assets

The main advantage of trading using opposite China Communications and Power Assets positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Communications position performs unexpectedly, Power Assets can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Power Assets will offset losses from the drop in Power Assets' long position.

The idea behind China Communications Services and Power Assets Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.