Correlation Between China Communications and Consolidated Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Communications and Consolidated Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Communications and Consolidated Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Communications Services and Consolidated Communications Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Communications and Consolidated Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Communications with a short position of Consolidated Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Communications and Consolidated Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for China Communications and Consolidated Communications
0.39 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between China and Consolidated is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Communications Services and Consolidated Communications Ho in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Consolidated Communications and China Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Communications Services are associated (or correlated) with Consolidated Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Consolidated Communications has no effect on the direction of China Communications i.e., China Communications and Consolidated Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between China Communications and Consolidated Communications
Assuming the 90 days horizon China Communications Services is expected to generate 2.29 times more return on investment than Consolidated Communications. However, China Communications is 2.29 times more volatile than Consolidated Communications Holdings. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Consolidated Communications Holdings is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9.02 in China Communications Services on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 45.98 from holding China Communications Services or generate 509.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
China Communications Services vs. Consolidated Communications Ho
Performance |
Timeline |
China Communications |
Consolidated Communications |
China Communications and Consolidated Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with China Communications and Consolidated Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite China Communications and Consolidated Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Communications position performs unexpectedly, Consolidated Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Consolidated Communications will offset losses from the drop in Consolidated Communications' long position.China Communications vs. T Mobile | China Communications vs. Verizon Communications | China Communications vs. ATT Inc | China Communications vs. Deutsche Telekom AG |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings |