Correlation Between Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Global with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging

-0.32

Correlation Coefficient

Columbia Global  Mfs Emerging

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Mfs is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Columbia Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Global Technology are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Columbia Global i.e., Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Global Technology is expected to generate 4.61 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Columbia Global is 4.61 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,480  in Columbia Global Technology on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  807.00  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 9.52% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Columbia Global Technology  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

Columbia Global Tech

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Global may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Mfs Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Global and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Global position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.

The idea behind Columbia Global Technology and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.