Correlation Between Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Canadian Imperial Bank and Questor Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Canadian Imperial with a short position of Questor Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology

-0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Canadian and Questor is -0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Canadian Imperial Bank and Questor Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Questor Technology and Canadian Imperial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Canadian Imperial Bank are associated (or correlated) with Questor Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Questor Technology has no effect on the direction of Canadian Imperial i.e., Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Canadian Imperial is expected to generate 5.71 times less return on investment than Questor Technology. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Canadian Imperial Bank is 15.96 times less risky than Questor Technology. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Questor Technology is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  37.00  in Questor Technology on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Questor Technology or generate 8.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Canadian Imperial Bank  vs.  Questor Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Canadian Imperial Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Canadian Imperial Bank are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Canadian Imperial is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Questor Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Questor Technology are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Questor Technology showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Canadian Imperial and Questor Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Canadian Imperial position performs unexpectedly, Questor Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Questor Technology will offset losses from the drop in Questor Technology's long position.
The idea behind Canadian Imperial Bank and Questor Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity