Correlation Between Credit Agricole and Iron

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Credit Agricole and Iron at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Credit Agricole and Iron into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Credit Agricole Egypt and Iron And Steel, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Credit Agricole and Iron and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Credit Agricole with a short position of Iron. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Credit Agricole and Iron.

Diversification Opportunities for Credit Agricole and Iron

0.03
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Credit and Iron is 0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Credit Agricole Egypt and Iron And Steel in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Iron And Steel and Credit Agricole is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Credit Agricole Egypt are associated (or correlated) with Iron. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Iron And Steel has no effect on the direction of Credit Agricole i.e., Credit Agricole and Iron go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Credit Agricole and Iron

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Credit Agricole is expected to generate 1.83 times less return on investment than Iron. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Credit Agricole Egypt is 1.55 times less risky than Iron. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Iron And Steel is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  122.00  in Iron And Steel on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  275.00  from holding Iron And Steel or generate 225.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Credit Agricole Egypt  vs.  Iron And Steel

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Credit Agricole Egypt 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Credit Agricole Egypt has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.
Iron And Steel 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Iron And Steel has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Credit Agricole and Iron Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Credit Agricole and Iron

The main advantage of trading using opposite Credit Agricole and Iron positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Credit Agricole position performs unexpectedly, Iron can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Iron will offset losses from the drop in Iron's long position.
The idea behind Credit Agricole Egypt and Iron And Steel pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world