Correlation Between Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Mid, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chestnut Street with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chestnut and Goldman is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Mid in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Mid and Chestnut Street is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chestnut Street Exchange are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Mid has no effect on the direction of Chestnut Street i.e., Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chestnut Street Exchange is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Chestnut Street Exchange is 1.49 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Mid is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  106,449  in Chestnut Street Exchange on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8,659  from holding Chestnut Street Exchange or generate 8.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chestnut Street Exchange  vs.  Goldman Sachs Mid

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chestnut Street Exchange 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chestnut Street Exchange are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Chestnut Street is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Mid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Mid has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chestnut Street and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chestnut Street position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Chestnut Street Exchange and Goldman Sachs Mid pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets