Correlation Between Chestnut Street and Calvert International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chestnut Street and Calvert International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chestnut Street and Calvert International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chestnut Street Exchange and Calvert International Opportunities, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chestnut Street and Calvert International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chestnut Street with a short position of Calvert International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chestnut Street and Calvert International.

Diversification Opportunities for Chestnut Street and Calvert International

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chestnut and Calvert is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chestnut Street Exchange and Calvert International Opportun in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert International and Chestnut Street is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chestnut Street Exchange are associated (or correlated) with Calvert International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert International has no effect on the direction of Chestnut Street i.e., Chestnut Street and Calvert International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chestnut Street and Calvert International

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chestnut Street Exchange is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Calvert International. However, Chestnut Street Exchange is 1.49 times less risky than Calvert International. It trades about -0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert International Opportunities is currently generating about -0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  118,429  in Chestnut Street Exchange on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3,321) from holding Chestnut Street Exchange or give up 2.8% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chestnut Street Exchange  vs.  Calvert International Opportun

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chestnut Street Exchange 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chestnut Street Exchange are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Chestnut Street is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Calvert International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Calvert International Opportunities has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Chestnut Street and Calvert International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chestnut Street and Calvert International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chestnut Street and Calvert International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chestnut Street position performs unexpectedly, Calvert International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert International will offset losses from the drop in Calvert International's long position.
The idea behind Chestnut Street Exchange and Calvert International Opportunities pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk