Correlation Between City Holding and Columbia Banking

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both City Holding and Columbia Banking at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining City Holding and Columbia Banking into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between City Holding and Columbia Banking System, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on City Holding and Columbia Banking and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in City Holding with a short position of Columbia Banking. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of City Holding and Columbia Banking.

Diversification Opportunities for City Holding and Columbia Banking

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between City and Columbia is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding City Holding and Columbia Banking System in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Banking System and City Holding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on City Holding are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Banking. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Banking System has no effect on the direction of City Holding i.e., City Holding and Columbia Banking go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between City Holding and Columbia Banking

Given the investment horizon of 90 days City Holding is expected to generate 0.59 times more return on investment than Columbia Banking. However, City Holding is 1.71 times less risky than Columbia Banking. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Banking System is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,654  in City Holding on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,556  from holding City Holding or generate 41.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

City Holding  vs.  Columbia Banking System

 Performance 
       Timeline  
City Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in City Holding are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, City Holding is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Banking System 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Banking System are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat inconsistent essential indicators, Columbia Banking may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

City Holding and Columbia Banking Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with City Holding and Columbia Banking

The main advantage of trading using opposite City Holding and Columbia Banking positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Banking can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Banking will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Banking's long position.
The idea behind City Holding and Columbia Banking System pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals