Correlation Between Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands,

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Comstock Holding Companies and FitLife Brands, Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Comstock Holding with a short position of FitLife Brands,. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands,.

Diversification Opportunities for Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands,

-0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Comstock and FitLife is -0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Comstock Holding Companies and FitLife Brands, Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FitLife Brands, Common and Comstock Holding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Comstock Holding Companies are associated (or correlated) with FitLife Brands,. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FitLife Brands, Common has no effect on the direction of Comstock Holding i.e., Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands,

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Comstock Holding Companies is expected to generate 1.19 times more return on investment than FitLife Brands,. However, Comstock Holding is 1.19 times more volatile than FitLife Brands, Common. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FitLife Brands, Common is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  600.00  in Comstock Holding Companies on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  319.00  from holding Comstock Holding Companies or generate 53.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Comstock Holding Companies  vs.  FitLife Brands, Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Comstock Holding Com 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Comstock Holding Companies are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly unsteady fundamental indicators, Comstock Holding demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands,

The main advantage of trading using opposite Comstock Holding and FitLife Brands, positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Comstock Holding position performs unexpectedly, FitLife Brands, can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FitLife Brands, will offset losses from the drop in FitLife Brands,'s long position.
The idea behind Comstock Holding Companies and FitLife Brands, Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world