Correlation Between Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chase Growth Fund and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chase Growth with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging

-0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chase and Mfs is -0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chase Growth Fund and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Chase Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chase Growth Fund are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Chase Growth i.e., Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chase Growth Fund is expected to generate 3.43 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Chase Growth is 3.43 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.26 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,541  in Chase Growth Fund on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  228.00  from holding Chase Growth Fund or generate 14.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chase Growth Fund  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chase Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chase Growth Fund are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Chase Growth showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chase Growth and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chase Growth position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Chase Growth Fund and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data