Correlation Between Challenger and RLF AgTech
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Challenger and RLF AgTech at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Challenger and RLF AgTech into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Challenger and RLF AgTech, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Challenger and RLF AgTech and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Challenger with a short position of RLF AgTech. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Challenger and RLF AgTech.
Diversification Opportunities for Challenger and RLF AgTech
0.11 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Challenger and RLF is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Challenger and RLF AgTech in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on RLF AgTech and Challenger is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Challenger are associated (or correlated) with RLF AgTech. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of RLF AgTech has no effect on the direction of Challenger i.e., Challenger and RLF AgTech go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Challenger and RLF AgTech
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Challenger is expected to generate 0.5 times more return on investment than RLF AgTech. However, Challenger is 2.0 times less risky than RLF AgTech. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. RLF AgTech is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest 699.00 in Challenger on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (77.00) from holding Challenger or give up 11.02% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Challenger vs. RLF AgTech
Performance |
Timeline |
Challenger |
RLF AgTech |
Challenger and RLF AgTech Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Challenger and RLF AgTech
The main advantage of trading using opposite Challenger and RLF AgTech positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Challenger position performs unexpectedly, RLF AgTech can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in RLF AgTech will offset losses from the drop in RLF AgTech's long position.Challenger vs. RLF AgTech | Challenger vs. Ainsworth Game Technology | Challenger vs. Advanced Braking Technology | Challenger vs. Sandon Capital Investments |
RLF AgTech vs. Clime Investment Management | RLF AgTech vs. Alto Metals | RLF AgTech vs. REGAL ASIAN INVESTMENTS | RLF AgTech vs. DY6 Metals |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |