Correlation Between Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Core Alternative ETF and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Core Alternative with a short position of Fidelity Dynamic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic.

Diversification Opportunities for Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic

-0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Core and Fidelity is -0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Core Alternative ETF and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Dynamic Buffered and Core Alternative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Core Alternative ETF are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Dynamic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Dynamic Buffered has no effect on the direction of Core Alternative i.e., Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Core Alternative ETF is expected to generate 1.15 times more return on investment than Fidelity Dynamic. However, Core Alternative is 1.15 times more volatile than Fidelity Dynamic Buffered. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Dynamic Buffered is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,561  in Core Alternative ETF on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  121.00  from holding Core Alternative ETF or generate 4.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Core Alternative ETF  vs.  Fidelity Dynamic Buffered

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Core Alternative ETF 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Core Alternative ETF are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Core Alternative is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Fidelity Dynamic Buffered has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Fidelity Dynamic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Core Alternative and Fidelity Dynamic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Core Alternative position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Dynamic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Dynamic will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Dynamic's long position.
The idea behind Core Alternative ETF and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges