Correlation Between Caterpillar and COVANTA
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Caterpillar and COVANTA HLDG P, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Caterpillar and COVANTA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Caterpillar with a short position of COVANTA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Caterpillar and COVANTA.
Diversification Opportunities for Caterpillar and COVANTA
0.64 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Caterpillar and COVANTA is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Caterpillar and COVANTA HLDG P in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on COVANTA HLDG P and Caterpillar is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Caterpillar are associated (or correlated) with COVANTA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of COVANTA HLDG P has no effect on the direction of Caterpillar i.e., Caterpillar and COVANTA go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Caterpillar and COVANTA
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Caterpillar is expected to generate 1.63 times more return on investment than COVANTA. However, Caterpillar is 1.63 times more volatile than COVANTA HLDG P. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. COVANTA HLDG P is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest 28,583 in Caterpillar on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 7,796 from holding Caterpillar or generate 27.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 91.9% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Caterpillar vs. COVANTA HLDG P
Performance |
Timeline |
Caterpillar |
COVANTA HLDG P |
Caterpillar and COVANTA Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Caterpillar and COVANTA
The main advantage of trading using opposite Caterpillar and COVANTA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Caterpillar position performs unexpectedly, COVANTA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in COVANTA will offset losses from the drop in COVANTA's long position.Caterpillar vs. AGCO Corporation | Caterpillar vs. Nikola Corp | Caterpillar vs. PACCAR Inc | Caterpillar vs. Deere Company |
COVANTA vs. Abcellera Biologics | COVANTA vs. Stagwell | COVANTA vs. BioNTech SE | COVANTA vs. Sellas Life Sciences |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |