Correlation Between CONSOL Energy and MC Mining
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CONSOL Energy and MC Mining at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CONSOL Energy and MC Mining into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between CONSOL Energy and MC Mining, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CONSOL Energy and MC Mining and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CONSOL Energy with a short position of MC Mining. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CONSOL Energy and MC Mining.
Diversification Opportunities for CONSOL Energy and MC Mining
-0.08 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between CONSOL and G1V is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CONSOL Energy and MC Mining in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MC Mining and CONSOL Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CONSOL Energy are associated (or correlated) with MC Mining. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MC Mining has no effect on the direction of CONSOL Energy i.e., CONSOL Energy and MC Mining go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between CONSOL Energy and MC Mining
Assuming the 90 days horizon CONSOL Energy is expected to generate 53.49 times less return on investment than MC Mining. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, CONSOL Energy is 34.91 times less risky than MC Mining. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MC Mining is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 18.00 in MC Mining on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (17.85) from holding MC Mining or give up 99.17% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
CONSOL Energy vs. MC Mining
Performance |
Timeline |
CONSOL Energy |
MC Mining |
CONSOL Energy and MC Mining Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with CONSOL Energy and MC Mining
The main advantage of trading using opposite CONSOL Energy and MC Mining positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CONSOL Energy position performs unexpectedly, MC Mining can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MC Mining will offset losses from the drop in MC Mining's long position.CONSOL Energy vs. TITANIUM TRANSPORTGROUP | CONSOL Energy vs. Broadridge Financial Solutions | CONSOL Energy vs. Apollo Investment Corp | CONSOL Energy vs. SEI INVESTMENTS |
MC Mining vs. CHINA SHENHUA ENA | MC Mining vs. China Coal Energy | MC Mining vs. Yancoal Australia | MC Mining vs. Banpu PCL |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |