Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and Sabra Health Care, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of Sabra Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health.
Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health
0.39 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and Sabra is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and Sabra Health Care in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sabra Health Care and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Sabra Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sabra Health Care has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health
Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than Sabra Health. However, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 2.34 times less risky than Sabra Health. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sabra Health Care is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 410.00 in Consolidated Communications Holdings on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 38.00 from holding Consolidated Communications Holdings or generate 9.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Consolidated Communications Ho vs. Sabra Health Care
Performance |
Timeline |
Consolidated Communications |
Sabra Health Care |
Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health
The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and Sabra Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, Sabra Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sabra Health will offset losses from the drop in Sabra Health's long position.The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and Sabra Health Care pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Sabra Health vs. Welltower | Sabra Health vs. Healthpeak Properties | Sabra Health vs. Omega Healthcare Investors | Sabra Health vs. Medical Properties Trust |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |