Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and General Mills

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and General Mills at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and General Mills into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and General Mills, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and General Mills and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of General Mills. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and General Mills.

Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and General Mills

-0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and General is -0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and General Mills in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on General Mills and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with General Mills. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of General Mills has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and General Mills go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and General Mills

Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications Holdings is expected to generate 0.75 times more return on investment than General Mills. However, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 1.33 times less risky than General Mills. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. General Mills is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  396.00  in Consolidated Communications Holdings on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  52.00  from holding Consolidated Communications Holdings or generate 13.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Consolidated Communications Ho  vs.  General Mills

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Consolidated Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Over the last 90 days Consolidated Communications Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Consolidated Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
General Mills 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days General Mills has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable primary indicators, General Mills is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Consolidated Communications and General Mills Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and General Mills

The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and General Mills positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, General Mills can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in General Mills will offset losses from the drop in General Mills' long position.
The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and General Mills pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges