Correlation Between Citigroup and Monster Beverage

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Monster Beverage at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Monster Beverage into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Monster Beverage Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Monster Beverage and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Monster Beverage. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Monster Beverage.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Monster Beverage

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Monster is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Monster Beverage Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Monster Beverage Corp and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Monster Beverage. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Monster Beverage Corp has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Monster Beverage go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Monster Beverage

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Citigroup is expected to generate 1.03 times more return on investment than Monster Beverage. However, Citigroup is 1.03 times more volatile than Monster Beverage Corp. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Monster Beverage Corp is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  67,114  in Citigroup on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  70,887  from holding Citigroup or generate 105.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Monster Beverage Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak primary indicators, Citigroup showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Monster Beverage Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Monster Beverage Corp are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Monster Beverage is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Monster Beverage Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Monster Beverage

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Monster Beverage positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Monster Beverage can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monster Beverage will offset losses from the drop in Monster Beverage's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Monster Beverage Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals