Correlation Between Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Barings Emerging Markets and Shelton Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Barings Emerging with a short position of Shelton Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Barings and Shelton is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Barings Emerging Markets and Shelton Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Shelton Emerging Markets and Barings Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Barings Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Shelton Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Shelton Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Barings Emerging i.e., Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Barings Emerging is expected to generate 4.41 times less return on investment than Shelton Emerging. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Barings Emerging Markets is 2.88 times less risky than Shelton Emerging. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Shelton Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,649  in Shelton Emerging Markets on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  88.00  from holding Shelton Emerging Markets or generate 5.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Barings Emerging Markets  vs.  Shelton Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Barings Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Barings Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Barings Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Shelton Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Shelton Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong essential indicators, Shelton Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Barings Emerging and Shelton Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Barings Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Shelton Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Shelton Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Shelton Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Barings Emerging Markets and Shelton Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets