Correlation Between Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bowman Consulting Group and Great Lakes Dredge, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bowman Consulting with a short position of Great Lakes. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes.

Diversification Opportunities for Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes

0.83

Correlation Coefficient

Bowman Consulting  Great Lakes

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bowman and Great is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bowman Consulting Group and Great Lakes Dredge in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Great Lakes Dredge and Bowman Consulting is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bowman Consulting Group are associated (or correlated) with Great Lakes. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Great Lakes Dredge has no effect on the direction of Bowman Consulting i.e., Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Bowman Consulting Group is expected to generate 0.93 times more return on investment than Great Lakes. However, Bowman Consulting Group is 1.08 times less risky than Great Lakes. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Great Lakes Dredge is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,516  in Bowman Consulting Group on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (248.00) from holding Bowman Consulting Group or give up 9.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bowman Consulting Group  vs.  Great Lakes Dredge

Bowman Consulting

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Bowman Consulting Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Great Lakes Dredge

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Great Lakes Dredge has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Pair Trading with Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bowman Consulting and Great Lakes positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bowman Consulting position performs unexpectedly, Great Lakes can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Great Lakes will offset losses from the drop in Great Lakes' long position.

The idea behind Bowman Consulting Group and Great Lakes Dredge pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.