Correlation Between BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BURLINGTON STORES with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications
-0.74 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between BURLINGTON and China is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and BURLINGTON STORES is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BURLINGTON STORES are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of BURLINGTON STORES i.e., BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon BURLINGTON STORES is expected to under-perform the China Communications. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, BURLINGTON STORES is 1.41 times less risky than China Communications. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 53.00 in China Communications Services on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 3.00 from holding China Communications Services or generate 5.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
BURLINGTON STORES vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
Timeline |
BURLINGTON STORES |
China Communications |
BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite BURLINGTON STORES and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BURLINGTON STORES position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.BURLINGTON STORES vs. INTERSHOP Communications Aktiengesellschaft | BURLINGTON STORES vs. CHINA TELECOM H | BURLINGTON STORES vs. ecotel communication ag | BURLINGTON STORES vs. T MOBILE US |
China Communications vs. NTG Nordic Transport | China Communications vs. CREDIT AGRICOLE | China Communications vs. Takark Jelzlogbank Nyrt | China Communications vs. ADRIATIC METALS LS 013355 |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA |