Correlation Between John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Financial and Goldman Sachs Inflation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Goldman is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Financial and Goldman Sachs Inflation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Inflation and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Financial are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Inflation has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon John Hancock Financial is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, John Hancock is 6.48 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Inflation. It trades about -0.24 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Inflation is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  951.00  in Goldman Sachs Inflation on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Inflation or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Financial  vs.  Goldman Sachs Inflation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in John Hancock Financial are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of very conflicting basic indicators, John Hancock may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Goldman Sachs Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

John Hancock and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Financial and Goldman Sachs Inflation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios