Correlation Between Bt Brands and GLENLN
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bt Brands and GLENLN 4 16 APR 25, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bt Brands and GLENLN and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bt Brands with a short position of GLENLN. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bt Brands and GLENLN.
Diversification Opportunities for Bt Brands and GLENLN
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between BTBD and GLENLN is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bt Brands and GLENLN 4 16 APR 25 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GLENLN 4 16 and Bt Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bt Brands are associated (or correlated) with GLENLN. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GLENLN 4 16 has no effect on the direction of Bt Brands i.e., Bt Brands and GLENLN go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bt Brands and GLENLN
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Bt Brands is expected to generate 5.11 times more return on investment than GLENLN. However, Bt Brands is 5.11 times more volatile than GLENLN 4 16 APR 25. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GLENLN 4 16 APR 25 is currently generating about -0.36 per unit of risk. If you would invest 186.00 in Bt Brands on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (9.00) from holding Bt Brands or give up 4.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 33.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Bt Brands vs. GLENLN 4 16 APR 25
Performance |
Timeline |
Bt Brands |
GLENLN 4 16 |
Bt Brands and GLENLN Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Bt Brands and GLENLN
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bt Brands and GLENLN positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bt Brands position performs unexpectedly, GLENLN can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GLENLN will offset losses from the drop in GLENLN's long position.Bt Brands vs. Alsea SAB de | Bt Brands vs. Marstons PLC | Bt Brands vs. Bagger Daves Burger | Bt Brands vs. Marstons PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |