Correlation Between Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Brightsphere Investment Group and AssetMark Financial Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Brightsphere Investment with a short position of AssetMark Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Brightsphere and AssetMark is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Brightsphere Investment Group and AssetMark Financial Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AssetMark Financial and Brightsphere Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Brightsphere Investment Group are associated (or correlated) with AssetMark Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AssetMark Financial has no effect on the direction of Brightsphere Investment i.e., Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Brightsphere Investment Group is expected to generate 0.03 times more return on investment than AssetMark Financial. However, Brightsphere Investment Group is 30.24 times less risky than AssetMark Financial. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. AssetMark Financial Holdings is currently generating about -0.58 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,365  in Brightsphere Investment Group on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  725.00  from holding Brightsphere Investment Group or generate 30.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy4.69%
ValuesDaily Returns

Brightsphere Investment Group  vs.  AssetMark Financial Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Brightsphere Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Brightsphere Investment Group are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly abnormal forward indicators, Brightsphere Investment reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
AssetMark Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days AssetMark Financial Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Brightsphere Investment and AssetMark Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Brightsphere Investment position performs unexpectedly, AssetMark Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AssetMark Financial will offset losses from the drop in AssetMark Financial's long position.
The idea behind Brightsphere Investment Group and AssetMark Financial Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk