Correlation Between Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Rocky Mountain Liquor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Berkshire Hathaway with a short position of Rocky Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Berkshire and Rocky is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Rocky Mountain Liquor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rocky Mountain Liquor and Berkshire Hathaway is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Berkshire Hathaway CDR are associated (or correlated) with Rocky Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rocky Mountain Liquor has no effect on the direction of Berkshire Hathaway i.e., Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Berkshire Hathaway is expected to generate 1.36 times less return on investment than Rocky Mountain. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Berkshire Hathaway CDR is 4.74 times less risky than Rocky Mountain. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Rocky Mountain Liquor is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9.00  in Rocky Mountain Liquor on December 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1.00  from holding Rocky Mountain Liquor or generate 11.11% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

Berkshire Hathaway CDR  vs.  Rocky Mountain Liquor

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Berkshire Hathaway CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hathaway CDR are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Berkshire Hathaway displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Rocky Mountain Liquor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Rocky Mountain Liquor are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Rocky Mountain showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite Berkshire Hathaway and Rocky Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Berkshire Hathaway position performs unexpectedly, Rocky Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rocky Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Rocky Mountain's long position.
The idea behind Berkshire Hathaway CDR and Rocky Mountain Liquor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance