Correlation Between Bank of America and WELL Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and WELL Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and WELL Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and WELL Health Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and WELL Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of WELL Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and WELL Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and WELL Health

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and WELL is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and WELL Health Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on WELL Health Technologies and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with WELL Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of WELL Health Technologies has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and WELL Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and WELL Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 2.49 times less return on investment than WELL Health. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 1.66 times less risky than WELL Health. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. WELL Health Technologies is currently generating about 0.27 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  429.00  in WELL Health Technologies on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  240.00  from holding WELL Health Technologies or generate 55.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  WELL Health Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
WELL Health Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in WELL Health Technologies are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, WELL Health displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and WELL Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and WELL Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and WELL Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, WELL Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in WELL Health will offset losses from the drop in WELL Health's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and WELL Health Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories