Correlation Between Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bannerman Resources with a short position of Anfield Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bannerman and Anfield is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Anfield Resources and Bannerman Resources is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bannerman Resources are associated (or correlated) with Anfield Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Anfield Resources has no effect on the direction of Bannerman Resources i.e., Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources

Assuming the 90 days horizon Bannerman Resources is expected to generate 2.51 times less return on investment than Anfield Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bannerman Resources is 2.4 times less risky than Anfield Resources. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Anfield Resources is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5.00  in Anfield Resources on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Anfield Resources or generate 60.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bannerman Resources  vs.  Anfield Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bannerman Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bannerman Resources are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile essential indicators, Bannerman Resources reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Anfield Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Anfield Resources are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile fundamental indicators, Anfield Resources reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bannerman Resources position performs unexpectedly, Anfield Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Anfield Resources will offset losses from the drop in Anfield Resources' long position.
The idea behind Bannerman Resources and Anfield Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account