Correlation Between Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bankers Investment Trust and Cincinnati Financial Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bankers Investment with a short position of Cincinnati Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial

0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bankers and Cincinnati is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bankers Investment Trust and Cincinnati Financial Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cincinnati Financial Corp and Bankers Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bankers Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Cincinnati Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cincinnati Financial Corp has no effect on the direction of Bankers Investment i.e., Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bankers Investment Trust is expected to generate 0.57 times more return on investment than Cincinnati Financial. However, Bankers Investment Trust is 1.75 times less risky than Cincinnati Financial. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cincinnati Financial Corp is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,580  in Bankers Investment Trust on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  40.00  from holding Bankers Investment Trust or generate 0.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bankers Investment Trust  vs.  Cincinnati Financial Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bankers Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bankers Investment Trust are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Bankers Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Cincinnati Financial Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cincinnati Financial Corp are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Cincinnati Financial is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bankers Investment and Cincinnati Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bankers Investment position performs unexpectedly, Cincinnati Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cincinnati Financial will offset losses from the drop in Cincinnati Financial's long position.
The idea behind Bankers Investment Trust and Cincinnati Financial Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk