Correlation Between Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bristol Myers Squibb and Checkpoint Therapeutics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bristol Myers with a short position of Checkpoint Therapeutics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics.
Diversification Opportunities for Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics
0.8 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Bristol and Checkpoint is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bristol Myers Squibb and Checkpoint Therapeutics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Checkpoint Therapeutics and Bristol Myers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bristol Myers Squibb are associated (or correlated) with Checkpoint Therapeutics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Checkpoint Therapeutics has no effect on the direction of Bristol Myers i.e., Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bristol Myers is expected to generate 4.06 times less return on investment than Checkpoint Therapeutics. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bristol Myers Squibb is 2.0 times less risky than Checkpoint Therapeutics. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Checkpoint Therapeutics is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 221.00 in Checkpoint Therapeutics on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 218.00 from holding Checkpoint Therapeutics or generate 98.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Bristol Myers Squibb vs. Checkpoint Therapeutics
Performance |
Timeline |
Bristol Myers Squibb |
Checkpoint Therapeutics |
Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bristol Myers position performs unexpectedly, Checkpoint Therapeutics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Checkpoint Therapeutics will offset losses from the drop in Checkpoint Therapeutics' long position.Bristol Myers vs. Pfizer Inc | Bristol Myers vs. Johnson Johnson | Bristol Myers vs. Highway Holdings Limited | Bristol Myers vs. QCR Holdings |
Checkpoint Therapeutics vs. Milestone Pharmaceuticals | Checkpoint Therapeutics vs. Seres Therapeutics | Checkpoint Therapeutics vs. DiaMedica Therapeutics | Checkpoint Therapeutics vs. Lyra Therapeutics |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Other Complementary Tools
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |