Correlation Between Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bristol Myers Squibb and Checkpoint Therapeutics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bristol Myers with a short position of Checkpoint Therapeutics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics.

Diversification Opportunities for Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics

0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bristol and Checkpoint is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bristol Myers Squibb and Checkpoint Therapeutics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Checkpoint Therapeutics and Bristol Myers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bristol Myers Squibb are associated (or correlated) with Checkpoint Therapeutics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Checkpoint Therapeutics has no effect on the direction of Bristol Myers i.e., Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bristol Myers is expected to generate 4.06 times less return on investment than Checkpoint Therapeutics. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bristol Myers Squibb is 2.0 times less risky than Checkpoint Therapeutics. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Checkpoint Therapeutics is currently generating about 0.29 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  221.00  in Checkpoint Therapeutics on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  218.00  from holding Checkpoint Therapeutics or generate 98.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bristol Myers Squibb  vs.  Checkpoint Therapeutics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bristol Myers Squibb 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bristol Myers Squibb are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly unsteady primary indicators, Bristol Myers showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Checkpoint Therapeutics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

22 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Checkpoint Therapeutics are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Checkpoint Therapeutics unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bristol Myers and Checkpoint Therapeutics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bristol Myers position performs unexpectedly, Checkpoint Therapeutics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Checkpoint Therapeutics will offset losses from the drop in Checkpoint Therapeutics' long position.
The idea behind Bristol Myers Squibb and Checkpoint Therapeutics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance