Correlation Between British American and TIMES CHINA

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both British American and TIMES CHINA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining British American and TIMES CHINA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between British American Tobacco and TIMES CHINA HLDGS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on British American and TIMES CHINA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in British American with a short position of TIMES CHINA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of British American and TIMES CHINA.

Diversification Opportunities for British American and TIMES CHINA

-0.37

Correlation Coefficient

British American  TIMES CHINA

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between British and TIMES is -0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding British American Tobacco and TIMES CHINA HLDGS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on TIMES CHINA HLDGS and British American is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on British American Tobacco are associated (or correlated) with TIMES CHINA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of TIMES CHINA HLDGS has no effect on the direction of British American i.e., British American and TIMES CHINA go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between British American and TIMES CHINA

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon British American is expected to generate 11.42 times less return on investment than TIMES CHINA. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, British American Tobacco is 7.14 times less risky than TIMES CHINA. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. TIMES CHINA HLDGS is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.25  in TIMES CHINA HLDGS on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.15  from holding TIMES CHINA HLDGS or generate 4.62% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

British American Tobacco  vs.  TIMES CHINA HLDGS

British American Tobacco

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in British American Tobacco are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, British American unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

TIMES CHINA HLDGS

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in TIMES CHINA HLDGS are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, TIMES CHINA reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with British American and TIMES CHINA

The main advantage of trading using opposite British American and TIMES CHINA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if British American position performs unexpectedly, TIMES CHINA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in TIMES CHINA will offset losses from the drop in TIMES CHINA's long position.

The idea behind British American Tobacco and TIMES CHINA HLDGS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.