Correlation Between Bank of America and National Australia

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and National Australia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and National Australia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and National Australia Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and National Australia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of National Australia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and National Australia.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and National Australia

0.35
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and National is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and National Australia Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on National Australia Bank and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with National Australia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of National Australia Bank has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and National Australia go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and National Australia

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.54 times less return on investment than National Australia. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Bank of America is 2.64 times less risky than National Australia. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. National Australia Bank is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,052  in National Australia Bank on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  89.00  from holding National Australia Bank or generate 8.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  National Australia Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively steady essential indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price chaos, may contribute to medium-term losses for the stakeholders.
National Australia Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days National Australia Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Bank of America and National Australia Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and National Australia

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and National Australia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, National Australia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in National Australia will offset losses from the drop in National Australia's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and National Australia Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules