Correlation Between BLZ and MWAT

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BLZ and MWAT at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BLZ and MWAT into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between BLZ and MWAT, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BLZ and MWAT and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BLZ with a short position of MWAT. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BLZ and MWAT.

Diversification Opportunities for BLZ and MWAT

-0.36

Correlation Coefficient

BLZ  MWAT

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between BLZ and MWAT is -0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BLZ and MWAT in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MWAT and BLZ is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BLZ are associated (or correlated) with MWAT. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MWAT has no effect on the direction of BLZ i.e., BLZ and MWAT go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BLZ and MWAT

If you would invest  0.48  in MWAT on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding MWAT or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	0.76%
Values	Daily Returns

BLZ  vs.  MWAT

BLZ

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BLZ are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, BLZ exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

MWAT

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days MWAT has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, MWAT is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Pair Trading with BLZ and MWAT

The main advantage of trading using opposite BLZ and MWAT positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BLZ position performs unexpectedly, MWAT can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MWAT will offset losses from the drop in MWAT's long position.

The idea behind BLZ and MWAT pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.