Correlation Between Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ginnie Mae Fund and Strategic Allocation Servative, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ginnie Mae with a short position of Strategic Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation

0.29

Correlation Coefficient

Ginnie Mae  Strategic Allocation

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ginnie and Strategic is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ginnie Mae Fund and Strategic Allocation Servative in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Allocation and Ginnie Mae is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ginnie Mae Fund are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Allocation has no effect on the direction of Ginnie Mae i.e., Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Ginnie Mae Fund is expected to under-perform the Strategic Allocation. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ginnie Mae Fund is 1.18 times less risky than Strategic Allocation. The mutual fund trades about -0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Strategic Allocation Servative is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  547.00  in Strategic Allocation Servative on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5.00) from holding Strategic Allocation Servative or give up 0.91% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Ginnie Mae Fund  vs.  Strategic Allocation Servative

Ginnie Mae Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Ginnie Mae Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Ginnie Mae is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Strategic Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Servative has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ginnie Mae and Strategic Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ginnie Mae position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Allocation's long position.

The idea behind Ginnie Mae Fund and Strategic Allocation Servative pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.