Correlation Between Baxter International and Regional Health
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Baxter International and Regional Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Baxter International and Regional Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Baxter International and Regional Health Properties, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Baxter International and Regional Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Baxter International with a short position of Regional Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Baxter International and Regional Health.
Diversification Opportunities for Baxter International and Regional Health
0.53 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Baxter and Regional is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Baxter International and Regional Health Properties in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Regional Health Prop and Baxter International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Baxter International are associated (or correlated) with Regional Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Regional Health Prop has no effect on the direction of Baxter International i.e., Baxter International and Regional Health go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Baxter International and Regional Health
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Baxter International is expected to generate 13.82 times less return on investment than Regional Health. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Baxter International is 14.88 times less risky than Regional Health. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Regional Health Properties is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 153.00 in Regional Health Properties on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 79.00 from holding Regional Health Properties or generate 51.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 40.98% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Baxter International vs. Regional Health Properties
Performance |
Timeline |
Baxter International |
Regional Health Prop |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Good
Weak | Strong |
Baxter International and Regional Health Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Baxter International and Regional Health
The main advantage of trading using opposite Baxter International and Regional Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Baxter International position performs unexpectedly, Regional Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Regional Health will offset losses from the drop in Regional Health's long position.Baxter International vs. Embecta Corp | Baxter International vs. West Pharmaceutical Services | Baxter International vs. ResMed Inc | Baxter International vs. The Cooper Companies, |
Regional Health vs. Ramsay Health Care | Regional Health vs. Jack Nathan Medical | Regional Health vs. Nova Leap Health | Regional Health vs. Fresenius SE Co |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like |