Correlation Between Band Protocol and Ethereum Name

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Band Protocol and Ethereum Name at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Band Protocol and Ethereum Name into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Band Protocol and Ethereum Name Service, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Band Protocol and Ethereum Name and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Band Protocol with a short position of Ethereum Name. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Band Protocol and Ethereum Name.

Diversification Opportunities for Band Protocol and Ethereum Name

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Band and Ethereum is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Band Protocol and Ethereum Name Service in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ethereum Name Service and Band Protocol is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Band Protocol are associated (or correlated) with Ethereum Name. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ethereum Name Service has no effect on the direction of Band Protocol i.e., Band Protocol and Ethereum Name go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Band Protocol and Ethereum Name

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Band Protocol is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than Ethereum Name. However, Band Protocol is 1.02 times more volatile than Ethereum Name Service. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ethereum Name Service is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  141.00  in Band Protocol on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (69.00) from holding Band Protocol or give up 48.94% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Band Protocol  vs.  Ethereum Name Service

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Band Protocol 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Band Protocol has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Crypto's fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for Band Protocol shareholders.
Ethereum Name Service 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Ethereum Name Service has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Crypto's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for Ethereum Name Service shareholders.

Band Protocol and Ethereum Name Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Band Protocol and Ethereum Name

The main advantage of trading using opposite Band Protocol and Ethereum Name positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Band Protocol position performs unexpectedly, Ethereum Name can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ethereum Name will offset losses from the drop in Ethereum Name's long position.
The idea behind Band Protocol and Ethereum Name Service pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings