Correlation Between Bridger Aerospace and First Responder

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bridger Aerospace and First Responder at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bridger Aerospace and First Responder into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bridger Aerospace Group and First Responder Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bridger Aerospace and First Responder and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bridger Aerospace with a short position of First Responder. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bridger Aerospace and First Responder.

Diversification Opportunities for Bridger Aerospace and First Responder

-0.21
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bridger and First is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bridger Aerospace Group and First Responder Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on First Responder Tech and Bridger Aerospace is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bridger Aerospace Group are associated (or correlated) with First Responder. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of First Responder Tech has no effect on the direction of Bridger Aerospace i.e., Bridger Aerospace and First Responder go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bridger Aerospace and First Responder

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Bridger Aerospace Group is expected to under-perform the First Responder. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bridger Aerospace Group is 7.22 times less risky than First Responder. The stock trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The First Responder Technologies is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7.81  in First Responder Technologies on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5.71) from holding First Responder Technologies or give up 73.11% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bridger Aerospace Group  vs.  First Responder Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bridger Aerospace 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bridger Aerospace Group are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Bridger Aerospace may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
First Responder Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in First Responder Technologies are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly abnormal basic indicators, First Responder reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bridger Aerospace and First Responder Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bridger Aerospace and First Responder

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bridger Aerospace and First Responder positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bridger Aerospace position performs unexpectedly, First Responder can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in First Responder will offset losses from the drop in First Responder's long position.
The idea behind Bridger Aerospace Group and First Responder Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes