Correlation Between Bank of America and XYLEM
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and XYLEM INC 325, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and XYLEM and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of XYLEM. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and XYLEM.
Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and XYLEM
-0.04 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Bank and XYLEM is -0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and XYLEM INC 325 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on XYLEM INC 325 and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with XYLEM. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of XYLEM INC 325 has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and XYLEM go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bank of America and XYLEM
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the XYLEM. In addition to that, Bank of America is 4.43 times more volatile than XYLEM INC 325. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. XYLEM INC 325 is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,747 in XYLEM INC 325 on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (212.00) from holding XYLEM INC 325 or give up 2.18% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.39% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Bank of America vs. XYLEM INC 325
Performance |
Timeline |
Bank of America |
XYLEM INC 325 |
Bank of America and XYLEM Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Bank of America and XYLEM
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and XYLEM positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, XYLEM can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in XYLEM will offset losses from the drop in XYLEM's long position.Bank of America vs. Citigroup | Bank of America vs. Wells Fargo | Bank of America vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Bank of America vs. Royal Bank of |
XYLEM vs. Willamette Valley Vineyards | XYLEM vs. Mayfair Gold Corp | XYLEM vs. Porvair plc | XYLEM vs. Alaska Air Group |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.
Other Complementary Tools
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |