Correlation Between Bank of America and MBGGR
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and MBGGR and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of MBGGR. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and MBGGR.
Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and MBGGR
0.74 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Bank and MBGGR is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MBGGR 33 19 and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with MBGGR. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MBGGR 33 19 has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and MBGGR go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Bank of America and MBGGR
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the MBGGR. In addition to that, Bank of America is 1.86 times more volatile than MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25. It trades about -0.14 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25 is currently generating about -0.24 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,919 in MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25 on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (180.00) from holding MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25 or give up 1.81% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 54.55% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Bank of America vs. MBGGR 33 19 MAY 25
Performance |
Timeline |
Bank of America |
MBGGR 33 19 |
Bank of America and MBGGR Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Bank of America and MBGGR
The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and MBGGR positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, MBGGR can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MBGGR will offset losses from the drop in MBGGR's long position.Bank of America vs. Citigroup | Bank of America vs. Wells Fargo | Bank of America vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Bank of America vs. Royal Bank of |
MBGGR vs. Edgewell Personal Care | MBGGR vs. Century Aluminum | MBGGR vs. Weyco Group | MBGGR vs. Insteel Industries |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Other Complementary Tools
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |