Correlation Between Bank of America and STF Tactical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and STF Tactical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and STF Tactical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and STF Tactical Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and STF Tactical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of STF Tactical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and STF Tactical.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and STF Tactical

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and STF is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and STF Tactical Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on STF Tactical Growth and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with STF Tactical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of STF Tactical Growth has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and STF Tactical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and STF Tactical

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.59 times more return on investment than STF Tactical. However, Bank of America is 1.59 times more volatile than STF Tactical Growth. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. STF Tactical Growth is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,903  in Bank of America on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,664  from holding Bank of America or generate 57.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy99.63%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  STF Tactical Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
STF Tactical Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in STF Tactical Growth are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very inconsistent technical and fundamental indicators, STF Tactical displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bank of America and STF Tactical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and STF Tactical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and STF Tactical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, STF Tactical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in STF Tactical will offset losses from the drop in STF Tactical's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and STF Tactical Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device