Correlation Between Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Juggernaut Exploration. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration

-0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Juggernaut is -0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Juggernaut Exploration and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Juggernaut Exploration. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Juggernaut Exploration has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 0.23 times more return on investment than Juggernaut Exploration. However, Bank of America is 4.26 times less risky than Juggernaut Exploration. It trades about 0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Juggernaut Exploration is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,182  in Bank of America on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  569.00  from holding Bank of America or generate 13.61% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Juggernaut Exploration

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady basic indicators, Bank of America exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Juggernaut Exploration 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Juggernaut Exploration has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Juggernaut Exploration can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Juggernaut Exploration will offset losses from the drop in Juggernaut Exploration's long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Juggernaut Exploration pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years