Correlation Between Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of Chrysalis Investments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Chrysalis is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Chrysalis Investments and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with Chrysalis Investments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Chrysalis Investments has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 1.05 times more return on investment than Chrysalis Investments. However, Bank of America is 1.05 times more volatile than Chrysalis Investments. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Chrysalis Investments is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,363  in Bank of America on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (238.00) from holding Bank of America or give up 5.45% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.38%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  Chrysalis Investments

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Chrysalis Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Chrysalis Investments has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.

Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, Chrysalis Investments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chrysalis Investments will offset losses from the drop in Chrysalis Investments' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and Chrysalis Investments pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities