Correlation Between Bank of America and China Coal

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and China Coal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and China Coal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and China Coal Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and China Coal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of China Coal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and China Coal.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and China Coal

-0.42

Correlation Coefficient

Bank of America  China Coal

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and China is -0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and China Coal Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Coal Energy and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with China Coal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Coal Energy has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and China Coal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and China Coal

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to generate 0.44 times more return on investment than China Coal. However, Bank of America is 2.28 times less risky than China Coal. It trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Coal Energy is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,725  in Bank of America on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (331.00) from holding Bank of America or give up 7.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  China Coal Energy

Bank of America

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

China Coal Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days China Coal Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Pair Trading with Bank of America and China Coal

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and China Coal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, China Coal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Coal will offset losses from the drop in China Coal's long position.

The idea behind Bank of America and China Coal Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.