Correlation Between Azure Holding and McKesson
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Azure Holding and McKesson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Azure Holding and McKesson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Azure Holding Group and McKesson, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Azure Holding and McKesson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Azure Holding with a short position of McKesson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Azure Holding and McKesson.
Diversification Opportunities for Azure Holding and McKesson
0.44 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Azure and McKesson is 0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Azure Holding Group and McKesson in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on McKesson and Azure Holding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Azure Holding Group are associated (or correlated) with McKesson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of McKesson has no effect on the direction of Azure Holding i.e., Azure Holding and McKesson go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Azure Holding and McKesson
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Azure Holding Group is expected to generate 13.96 times more return on investment than McKesson. However, Azure Holding is 13.96 times more volatile than McKesson. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. McKesson is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest 12.00 in Azure Holding Group on December 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 5.00 from holding Azure Holding Group or generate 41.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 98.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Azure Holding Group vs. McKesson
Performance |
Timeline |
Azure Holding Group |
McKesson |
Azure Holding and McKesson Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Azure Holding and McKesson
The main advantage of trading using opposite Azure Holding and McKesson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Azure Holding position performs unexpectedly, McKesson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in McKesson will offset losses from the drop in McKesson's long position.Azure Holding vs. Radcom | Azure Holding vs. Digi International | Azure Holding vs. Broadleaf Co | Azure Holding vs. Yuexiu Transport Infrastructure |
McKesson vs. Cardinal Health | McKesson vs. Henry Schein | McKesson vs. Patterson Companies | McKesson vs. Owens Minor |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |