Correlation Between Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Schroders Investment Trusts and Bank of Georgia, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Schroders Investment with a short position of Bank of Georgia. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia.

Diversification Opportunities for Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Schroders and Bank is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Schroders Investment Trusts and Bank of Georgia in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of Georgia and Schroders Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Schroders Investment Trusts are associated (or correlated) with Bank of Georgia. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of Georgia has no effect on the direction of Schroders Investment i.e., Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Schroders Investment is expected to generate 5.05 times less return on investment than Bank of Georgia. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Schroders Investment Trusts is 2.39 times less risky than Bank of Georgia. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of Georgia is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  437,000  in Bank of Georgia on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  28,000  from holding Bank of Georgia or generate 6.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Schroders Investment Trusts  vs.  Bank of Georgia

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Schroders Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Schroders Investment Trusts has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Schroders Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Bank of Georgia 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of Georgia are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Bank of Georgia unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia

The main advantage of trading using opposite Schroders Investment and Bank of Georgia positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Schroders Investment position performs unexpectedly, Bank of Georgia can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of Georgia will offset losses from the drop in Bank of Georgia's long position.
The idea behind Schroders Investment Trusts and Bank of Georgia pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories