Correlation Between Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation: with a short position of Income Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

0.89

Correlation Coefficient

Strategic Allocation:  Income Growth

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Income is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Income Growth and Strategic Allocation: is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Moderate are associated (or correlated) with Income Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Income Growth has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation: i.e., Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation Moderate is expected to under-perform the Income Growth. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Strategic Allocation Moderate is 1.18 times less risky than Income Growth. The mutual fund trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Income Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,743  in Income Growth Fund on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Income Growth Fund or generate 0.83% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	98.33%
Values	Daily Returns

Strategic Allocation Moderate  vs.  Income Growth Fund

Strategic Allocation:

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Moderate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Allocation: is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Income Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Income Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation: and Income Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation: position performs unexpectedly, Income Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Income Growth will offset losses from the drop in Income Growth's long position.

The idea behind Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.