Correlation Between World Energy and Columbia Global

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both World Energy and Columbia Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining World Energy and Columbia Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between World Energy Fund and Columbia Global Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on World Energy and Columbia Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in World Energy with a short position of Columbia Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of World Energy and Columbia Global.

Diversification Opportunities for World Energy and Columbia Global

0.6

Correlation Coefficient

World Energy  Columbia Global

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between World and Columbia is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding World Energy Fund and Columbia Global Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Global Tech and World Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on World Energy Fund are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Global Tech has no effect on the direction of World Energy i.e., World Energy and Columbia Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between World Energy and Columbia Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon World Energy is expected to generate 4.06 times less return on investment than Columbia Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, World Energy Fund is 1.05 times less risky than Columbia Global. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Global Technology is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,885  in Columbia Global Technology on October 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,267  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 87.35% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

World Energy Fund  vs.  Columbia Global Technology

World Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in World Energy Fund are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, World Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Global Tech

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with World Energy and Columbia Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite World Energy and Columbia Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if World Energy position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Global will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Global's long position.

The idea behind World Energy Fund and Columbia Global Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.