Correlation Between American High-income and Multi-manager Global
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both American High-income and Multi-manager Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining American High-income and Multi-manager Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between American High Income Municipal and Multi Manager Global Listed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on American High-income and Multi-manager Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in American High-income with a short position of Multi-manager Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of American High-income and Multi-manager Global.
Diversification Opportunities for American High-income and Multi-manager Global
0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between American and Multi-manager is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding American High Income Municipal and Multi Manager Global Listed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Multi Manager Global and American High-income is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on American High Income Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Multi-manager Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Multi Manager Global has no effect on the direction of American High-income i.e., American High-income and Multi-manager Global go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between American High-income and Multi-manager Global
Assuming the 90 days horizon American High Income Municipal is expected to generate 0.36 times more return on investment than Multi-manager Global. However, American High Income Municipal is 2.81 times less risky than Multi-manager Global. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Multi Manager Global Listed is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,394 in American High Income Municipal on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 138.00 from holding American High Income Municipal or generate 9.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
American High Income Municipal vs. Multi Manager Global Listed
Performance |
Timeline |
American High Income |
Multi Manager Global |
American High-income and Multi-manager Global Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with American High-income and Multi-manager Global
The main advantage of trading using opposite American High-income and Multi-manager Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if American High-income position performs unexpectedly, Multi-manager Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Multi-manager Global will offset losses from the drop in Multi-manager Global's long position.The idea behind American High Income Municipal and Multi Manager Global Listed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Multi-manager Global vs. T Rowe Price | Multi-manager Global vs. American High Income Municipal | Multi-manager Global vs. Virtus Seix Government | Multi-manager Global vs. Pioneer Amt Free Municipal |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk |