Correlation Between Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Alkemy Capital Investments and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Alkemy Capital with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital

-0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Alkemy and Litigation is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Alkemy Capital Investments and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Alkemy Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Alkemy Capital Investments are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Alkemy Capital i.e., Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Alkemy Capital Investments is expected to generate 6.2 times more return on investment than Litigation Capital. However, Alkemy Capital is 6.2 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,750  in Alkemy Capital Investments on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,850  from holding Alkemy Capital Investments or generate 262.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Alkemy Capital Investments  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Alkemy Capital Inves 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Alkemy Capital Investments are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Alkemy Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Alkemy Capital and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Alkemy Capital position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Alkemy Capital Investments and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing